EXTENSIONALLY – ENERGY PERUSAL OF CONSTELLATION
Pavel Florensky offered extensionally-energy model, which helps to understand what happened when Constellation by Bert Hellinger method is hold. According to such conception we are able to see things, environment and space. Such trinity arranges any continuity: “any of these mental formations can be considered as the first and then proceed from it. Any of such mental formation can be taken as the first, it is certainly that other mental formations will be appeared...”[1]
If we are going from space, “it can be told that things – are “wrinkle” or “crinkle” of spaces, the places of it special distortion; the things can be treated ...as simple space’s holes - sources and flowing of world environment”[2]. If we start discoursing from things as the centre of power, the interpretation for space will be the following: “the space is the beginning, combining stress fields, giving an opportunity to reveal the stress filed.”[3] The first logic can be cold extensional. The second one is energy.
It is important to notice that any connection is mutual by definition. In particular, if we consider environment and something resided in it, the environment will be only in the case if its things and inhabitants realize their “resided in”. P.A. Florensky confirms in such connection the concept of “active passivity”, “it means object conformity to power influence, affected it: nothing can conceive an efficient cause without readiness to do this, without any condition of perception according to nature of acting force”. In such model a human being is associated with space and environment, which he is belonged to. In such a capacity he can be cold world inhabitant. We try to define that world’s integrity in particular case. And also it can be considered as possible centre, which forms space and environment around. In the second case the human being (individual or socially) is like Atlas and creator of the world, which he creates and recreates by his life and efforts.
THE SPACE WITH HUMAN PART
Constellation by the model of P.A. Florensky let us make speculations about the method and results.
When we define any particular in our life, we need to consider special integrity of that particular for understanding. And only when overall picture is seen, we are able to discover the thing everything began from. It is notable that exactly such method is used in constellation for situation mentioned above. In this context initial part is the problem and client’s request. Beyond the problem (so as beyond the thing in P.A. Florensky model) there is special world, formed by its energy centre, extensional borders, environment’s concentration and inhabitants. The constellation is turned to a special resorting to powers and energies of family or another system.
Such understanding the case leads us to the conclusion that constellation by Hellinger’s method opens up better opportunities to understand and learn anthropic worlds. Each of them appears with their extensionally-energy construction, environment, thing’s power and variety of inhabitants. This is the first thesis.
In this article we try to show two discoveries: about possibility of not lineal, event human’s connection with system and the aftermath exceptions. Hypothetically we are dealing with regularities, which are important to different (not only family-lineal) anthropic spaces.
Let’s pay attention in detail to each of both mentioned occurrence.
1. Lineal system connection with not relative. In a family space fundamental circle is evident as it is defined by the fact of birth. But it is not all. In a view of life circumstances some stranger can be connected with lineal system. Notably that exactly not relative can be “the most important person” by Bert Hellinger’s notice. In such cases the beginning is always caused by situation. To our opinion this is the answer to a question about general definition of such connection, which we call event connection. On the one hand when a human enters to a system, he places himself to “field of powers” and conceives the influence. On the other hand we become a “centre of power”, new system’s bundle. Each connection is mutual and that’s why it supposes the possibility of the event, meeting, which will be important for both participants – a human and a new world. As it is widely known a stone would not move by magnet gravitation, but it is subject to gravitation. Human’s view is changeable and not resistant to gravitation, but it gravitates by the thing’s beauty. In such meaning the observable Event is the case when human’s attendance in particular reality has taken place. Non-occurrence of event is the case of mutual transparency. The event supposes:
1) System configuration is changed: space organization, environment, centres of power correlation are changed;
2) “incomer” is changed;
3) Event connection is formed – the connection between meeting people, such connection is important for both parties.
Special question about energy-output ratio of Event. In any researching we have rapids of importance and observability. If we theoretically prescind from this fact, we can see the incogitable number of connections made by human’s slightest movement. We need to singularise those ones, which connect humans by “mutual fate” by B. Hellinger’s language and energy-intensive by the method of Florensky. In other words, we pay attention to the most important meetings and situations and because of them we reveal deep connection between participants personally and as clansman. And particularly in such case we can say about the event. In particular, psych-practice discovery of constellation is that war always has colossal meaning and strongly connects participants and their descendants[4]. The question about definition for the range of event connected with the generation is not evident and that’s why it is important to pay attention. It is interesting how Thomas Hafer defined “participant not relative” by the request of the author of this article. He paid attention to the situations between life and death, and also offered the term “the event of exhistantional meaning».
The second occurrence, which is important for our question, is aftermath of exception. Each connected to the system is to be recognized by the other participants. Breach of such principle leads to dramatic aftermaths[5]. Such situation can be analysed according to the mentioned above model. As it is understandable, for the literal perception of particular case (thing) we need to be familiarized with the reality. In the case of lineal community we have the whole world with all things and inhabitants. Each participant of family-lineal relation influences to the others and creates the curvature of space. If we try to “prohibit” system participant’s influence, energy will be stored and potential of centre of power will grow. It is energy meaning of exception, isn’t it? We can suppose that forbidden area has special energy-output ratio.
Constellation application to different anthropic realities has already become a practice and allows us to suppose that general and specific internals of these worlds are possible to be found in such works. It is possible to suppose that when we discover the power of event connection or aftermath of exception, we are dealing with displaying for the fundamental property of human’s world. Is it possible that we are observing in such occurrences the rules of anthropic synthesis, which is described by O.I. Genisaretsky[6]?
ABOUT ONE EVENT OF THE FIRST HALF OF XIII CENTURY
Ethnocultural world’s research can be interesting filed for application of considered idea. In these realities alive and culture generating sources are nations, in which “anthropic syntheses are aroused, behavioural stereotypes and sketchiness of perception/ willpower are formed”. [7]
As a pattern there is one event of XIII century. According to the map “Axis of passionary energy” by L.N. Gumilev, one of such impulsion was on the line of present Mongolia and Manchuria in XI century [8]. This event was a beginning for forming two great nations: The Mongols and Chzhurchzheni. Chzhurchzheni built empire in 1115, called Gold Empire and it involved Manchuria, Chinese lands, part of North Korea and also the area of present Russian areas of Promorye and Priamurye[9].
L.N. Gumilev writes about this: “when passionary energy flared up, the leader of Chzhurchzheni Aguda war down Kidan in 1116-1125, then reacted to the Chinese blow and Sun Empire made shameful peace and gave away to Chzhurchzheni all North China”. However, vanquisher didn’t mix with enslaved Chinese[10].
In last quarter of XII century Gold Empire was powerful and extensive. The Mongols didn’t have state yet. It is interesting to note that exactly this time is a period for not widely known life period of the future founder of the Mongol State. L.N. Gumilev in accordance with different sources cane to a conclusion that future Great Khan was in captivity of Chzhurchzheni (from 1186 to 1196)[11]. Tamudgin escaped the captivity and in the end of XII-beginning of the XIII established the state. In 1210 the war with Cold Empire was begun. The war was continued for 24 years and was finished with Czin shellacking. Taking into consideration the bellicosity of both nations, history of origin and relations between parties, we can suppose that it was very important fight for both parties and it was signed in origin of Mongol State.
Kaifyin and Caichgou were defeated in 1234, they were the last fortress of Czin. And in 1237 Ryazan was defeated by the inhabitant of steppe regions. The following 300 years period can be called the “Tartar Yoke” or it can be the synthesis of two origins in which Russian ethnos was born. Anyway, the end 30th XIII century is the beginning of deep interaction of Steppe and Russia, the meaning of that event is very important when we are speaking about origin of Russian super-ethnos and Russia. One of the main life priorities for new nation was irrepressible Removal to the East.
In the second half of XVI age Moscow became the capital of Reign. Sovereign of the state is not a prince any more, it is Monarch. And these years Ermak made his expedition to Siberia. Russians movement to the East became very important and maybe one of the most significant fact of Russian History. Manchuria, Primorye and Priamurye being the lands of ancient Churgeny became natural borders on their road. It seems that it was the right place for movement for trailblazers, entrepreneurs, and people of clerical and secular titles. The Russian trailblazers’ trip finished in the place where Mongol began their war with its passionary neighbours. There are the boards of special world, called Eurasia in XX century.
We think the events of the first half of XIII century can be considered as one subject, connected the history and fate of the nations of Gold Empire, Mongol and Russia. But do we still remember about these events? We can agree with M.V. Vorobyev that: “Chzhurchzheni are the nation with fame, which is much less than their role in history of Russia”[12]. Our museums have a lot of relics about ancient life of inhabitants of Pacific Russia. But what do they mean for us?
With a view to XIII century, our understanding of power fields, which form energy, irrepressibility and irrational of Russian movement to the East, can be notably changed. And maybe it helps us to understand something very important in the field of present day region strategy and policy.
[1] Florensky P.A. Articles and researches on history and philosophy of art and archaeology / Florensky P.A.– Ì., 2000. – P. 83
[2] Ibid. – P. 83.
[3] Ibid.– P. 111.
[4] . Hellinger B. Orders of love … / Hellinger B.– Ì., 2007. – P. 76
[5] Weber G. Two sorts of happiness... / Weber G. – Ì., 2005. – P. 150.
[6] Genisaretsky O.I. Cultural -anthropological prospect [Electronic resource] // Other. – [M.], 1997. Mode of access: http://o.ld.russ.ru/antolog/inoe/genis.htm/genis.htm. – 2007, August, 18.
[7] Genisaretsky O.I. Navigator: methodological expansions and continuations / Genisaretsky O.I. – Ì., 2002. – P.479.
[8] Gumilev L.N. Collected works: [in 4 vol.] / Gumilev L.N. – SPb, 2003. – [vol. 2] . – P.586.
[9] Vorobyev M.V. Chzhurchzheni and state of Czin / Vorobyev M.V. – Ì., 1978. – P.112
[10] Gumilev L.N. cit.– P. 773
[11] Accord with prisoner’s life period from 24 to 34 years old.
[12] Vorobyev M.V. cit.– P. 3.
Translated by Tolmacheva Maria
